<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 595 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331211</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals filed by the assessee, directing the cancellation of penalties under Sections 271B and 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act. In the first case, the Tribunal found that the assessee had a reasonable cause for not filing the tax audit report on time, as the accounts were audited before the specified date. The second penalty was canceled due to the reasonable cause of non-compliance related to personal issues faced by the tax consultant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:08:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 595 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331211</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals filed by the assessee, directing the cancellation of penalties under Sections 271B and 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act. In the first case, the Tribunal found that the assessee had a reasonable cause for not filing the tax audit report on time, as the accounts were audited before the specified date. The second penalty was canceled due to the reasonable cause of non-compliance related to personal issues faced by the tax consultant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>