<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 594 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331210</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling in favor of the assessee on both issues. It held that the disallowance of electricity expenses under section 40A(2)(b) was unjustified, considering the connection between the work performed and electricity consumption. Additionally, the disallowance under section 14A was reduced to 5% of the exempt income earned, deeming it fair and justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:08:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 594 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331210</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling in favor of the assessee on both issues. It held that the disallowance of electricity expenses under section 40A(2)(b) was unjustified, considering the connection between the work performed and electricity consumption. Additionally, the disallowance under section 14A was reduced to 5% of the exempt income earned, deeming it fair and justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>