https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4500 The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty on the undiscounted amount, finding that the appellant did not pass on the claimed discounts fully to customers. The extended period for demand was justified due to the appellant's failure to inform the department of the undiscounted amounts. The computation of demand was to be recalculated as per the Supreme Court's guidelines, and the matter was remanded for this limited purpose. en-us Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4500 The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty on the undiscounted amount, finding that the appellant did not pass on the claimed discounts fully to customers. The extended period for demand was justified due to the appellant's failure to inform the department of the undiscounted amounts. The computation of demand was to be recalculated as per the Supreme Court's guidelines, and the matter was remanded for this limited purpose. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4500