<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 710 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185497</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, disallowing the claimed business loss due to lack of business activity, but allowing interest income from FDRs as business income since the business was suspended, not closed. The disallowance of setting off business loss became irrelevant, and expenses disallowed by the AO were to be re-examined due to the business being under suspension. The levy of interest under section 234B was to be recalculated by the AO during implementation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:12:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 710 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185497</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, disallowing the claimed business loss due to lack of business activity, but allowing interest income from FDRs as business income since the business was suspended, not closed. The disallowance of setting off business loss became irrelevant, and expenses disallowed by the AO were to be re-examined due to the business being under suspension. The levy of interest under section 234B was to be recalculated by the AO during implementation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>