<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 736 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185493</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision in a case involving the clubbing of clearances of multiple manufacturing units, denial of Small Scale Industry (SSI) exemption benefits, and imposition of penalties. The units were deemed to be artificially fragmented, centrally managed by a single family, and engaged in financial inter-mixing, leading to the rejection of the appeals in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:52:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 736 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185493</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision in a case involving the clubbing of clearances of multiple manufacturing units, denial of Small Scale Industry (SSI) exemption benefits, and imposition of penalties. The units were deemed to be artificially fragmented, centrally managed by a single family, and engaged in financial inter-mixing, leading to the rejection of the appeals in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>