<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 591 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331207</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the transport operator, holding that they were not liable to pay service tax despite a refund claim rejection. The tribunal determined that the liability to pay service tax rested on the service recipient as per the agreement and Service Tax Rules, entitling the appellant to a refund. The tribunal emphasized that the legal liability to pay service tax cannot be shifted by private contract, ensuring compliance with the principles of unjust enrichment and interpreting the Service Tax Rules to support their decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 591 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331207</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the transport operator, holding that they were not liable to pay service tax despite a refund claim rejection. The tribunal determined that the liability to pay service tax rested on the service recipient as per the agreement and Service Tax Rules, entitling the appellant to a refund. The tribunal emphasized that the legal liability to pay service tax cannot be shifted by private contract, ensuring compliance with the principles of unjust enrichment and interpreting the Service Tax Rules to support their decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>