<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1555 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185488</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant to Rs. 2,500 and waived the redemption fine, aligning with a precedent case. The penalties were deemed excessive as the unaccounted goods were not ready for removal but pending customer confirmation, indicating no intent to evade duty payment. The appellant&#039;s inadvertent omission in record-keeping did not demonstrate an intention to evade duty payment, resulting in the reduction of penalties and waiver of the redemption fine, partially allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:49:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1555 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185488</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant to Rs. 2,500 and waived the redemption fine, aligning with a precedent case. The penalties were deemed excessive as the unaccounted goods were not ready for removal but pending customer confirmation, indicating no intent to evade duty payment. The appellant&#039;s inadvertent omission in record-keeping did not demonstrate an intention to evade duty payment, resulting in the reduction of penalties and waiver of the redemption fine, partially allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>