<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 588 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331204</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged the denial of utilizing CENVAT Credit for duty payment on waste and scrap from job work. The Member (Judicial) ruled in favor of the Appellants, emphasizing the lack of requirement for a direct input-output correlation in such cases. The decision highlighted previous Tribunal rulings and the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; acceptance of similar payments in a subsequent period, leading to setting aside the impugned order and granting relief to the Appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 588 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331204</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged the denial of utilizing CENVAT Credit for duty payment on waste and scrap from job work. The Member (Judicial) ruled in favor of the Appellants, emphasizing the lack of requirement for a direct input-output correlation in such cases. The decision highlighted previous Tribunal rulings and the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; acceptance of similar payments in a subsequent period, leading to setting aside the impugned order and granting relief to the Appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>