<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 588 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331204</link>
    <description>Duty on waste and scrap generated during job work may be discharged by debiting the CENVAT credit account, even where the credit was taken on inputs used in the manufacturer&#039;s own production. No one-to-one correlation is required between the input credit availed and the scrap cleared, and prior Tribunal precedent supports this mode of payment. Acceptance of the same approach for a subsequent period also reinforced the position. On that basis, the demand and penalty were not sustainable, and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 588 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331204</link>
      <description>Duty on waste and scrap generated during job work may be discharged by debiting the CENVAT credit account, even where the credit was taken on inputs used in the manufacturer&#039;s own production. No one-to-one correlation is required between the input credit availed and the scrap cleared, and prior Tribunal precedent supports this mode of payment. Acceptance of the same approach for a subsequent period also reinforced the position. On that basis, the demand and penalty were not sustainable, and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>