<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 585 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331201</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the respondent&#039;s entitlement to cenvat credit on construction services pre-01.04.2011. Construction of factory premises qualifies as an input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, emphasizing a broad interpretation to encompass activities crucial for manufacturing. The decision highlights the importance of enabling cenvat credit on essential services like construction for seamless operations and compliance in the manufacturing sector.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 585 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331201</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the respondent&#039;s entitlement to cenvat credit on construction services pre-01.04.2011. Construction of factory premises qualifies as an input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, emphasizing a broad interpretation to encompass activities crucial for manufacturing. The decision highlights the importance of enabling cenvat credit on essential services like construction for seamless operations and compliance in the manufacturing sector.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>