https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331199 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the disallowance of Cenvat credit on imported goods through Courier Bills of Entry. The appellants failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their case, leading to the confirmation of disallowance and penalty imposition. However, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellants on the time-barring issue, stating that there was no intentional evasion of duty and all necessary information had been disclosed as required by law. The impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeal with consequential reliefs, emphasizing the importance of proper documentation and transparency in dealings with tax authorities. en-us Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Aug 2016 00:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331199 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the disallowance of Cenvat credit on imported goods through Courier Bills of Entry. The appellants failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their case, leading to the confirmation of disallowance and penalty imposition. However, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellants on the time-barring issue, stating that there was no intentional evasion of duty and all necessary information had been disclosed as required by law. The impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeal with consequential reliefs, emphasizing the importance of proper documentation and transparency in dealings with tax authorities. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331199