<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 579 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331195</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order regarding the inclusion of freight and insurance charges in the assessable value of paper reels sent for cutting and subsequent sale from the depot. It held that duty is chargeable based on the value of goods at the time of removal, excluding transportation and insurance costs. The decision emphasized consistency in applying legal precedents and the importance of relevant legal definitions in determining tax liabilities under the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:46:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 579 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331195</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order regarding the inclusion of freight and insurance charges in the assessable value of paper reels sent for cutting and subsequent sale from the depot. It held that duty is chargeable based on the value of goods at the time of removal, excluding transportation and insurance costs. The decision emphasized consistency in applying legal precedents and the importance of relevant legal definitions in determining tax liabilities under the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>