<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 50 - HIGH COURT RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4495</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed, and the matter was remitted back to the Commissioner for a fresh decision on the penalty amount under Section 76. The judgment clarified the limits of authority in imposing penalties and emphasized the importance of complying with legal requirements in pursuing appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 50 - HIGH COURT RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4495</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed, and the matter was remitted back to the Commissioner for a fresh decision on the penalty amount under Section 76. The judgment clarified the limits of authority in imposing penalties and emphasized the importance of complying with legal requirements in pursuing appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>