https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331193 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, overturning the penalties imposed on the appellants under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The decision highlighted the lack of evidence proving the direct involvement of the appellants in the excise duty evasion scheme orchestrated by the main party. The judgment, delivered on 23.11.2015, emphasized that the penalties were not justified due to insufficient proof linking the appellants to the alleged financial fraud and duty evasion activities. en-us Mon, 23 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331193 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, overturning the penalties imposed on the appellants under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The decision highlighted the lack of evidence proving the direct involvement of the appellants in the excise duty evasion scheme orchestrated by the main party. The judgment, delivered on 23.11.2015, emphasized that the penalties were not justified due to insufficient proof linking the appellants to the alleged financial fraud and duty evasion activities. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331193