<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 574 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331190</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for condonation of delay in filing applications for brand rate fixation under Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 1995. Emphasizing a liberal interpretation of beneficial legislation, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and directed a broad approach in condoning delays. The matter was remitted back to the Commissioner for reconsideration in line with the Drawback Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 574 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331190</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for condonation of delay in filing applications for brand rate fixation under Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 1995. Emphasizing a liberal interpretation of beneficial legislation, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and directed a broad approach in condoning delays. The matter was remitted back to the Commissioner for reconsideration in line with the Drawback Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>