https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331189 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the penalty imposed under Section 47(6) of the KVAT Act, 2003. It found that notice was issued to the consignee, who demonstrated ownership of the goods, and there was no violation of natural justice. The petitioner was granted the right to appeal within two weeks, with the bank guarantee payment to be held for an additional four weeks pending appellate orders. If no orders were obtained, the bank was authorized to remit the penalty amount as per the previous request. en-us Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331189 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the penalty imposed under Section 47(6) of the KVAT Act, 2003. It found that notice was issued to the consignee, who demonstrated ownership of the goods, and there was no violation of natural justice. The petitioner was granted the right to appeal within two weeks, with the bank guarantee payment to be held for an additional four weeks pending appellate orders. If no orders were obtained, the bank was authorized to remit the penalty amount as per the previous request. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331189