<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 572 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331188</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a reassessment order under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was held not maintainable because an adequate statutory appeal remedy was available. The reassessment order was appealable, and the petitioner could raise all objections, including alleged breach of natural justice and computation errors, before the appellate authority. The limitation on remand power did not justify bypassing the appeal process, and none of the recognised exceptions to the alternative remedy rule, such as challenge to vires, serious natural justice breach, or patent lack of jurisdiction, were established. The writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:31:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 572 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331188</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a reassessment order under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was held not maintainable because an adequate statutory appeal remedy was available. The reassessment order was appealable, and the petitioner could raise all objections, including alleged breach of natural justice and computation errors, before the appellate authority. The limitation on remand power did not justify bypassing the appeal process, and none of the recognised exceptions to the alternative remedy rule, such as challenge to vires, serious natural justice breach, or patent lack of jurisdiction, were established. The writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>