https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331188 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a reassessment order under Section 39(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act for the assessment year 2009-10. It emphasized that writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked directly under Article 226 unless specific parameters are met. The Court highlighted that the reassessment order is appealable before the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) and the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, and issues of natural justice can be raised before the appellate authority. The Court found no severe breach of natural justice as the petitioner had the opportunity to raise objections. It concluded by stating the petitioner could seek relief through the available appellate remedy. en-us Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:31:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331188 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a reassessment order under Section 39(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act for the assessment year 2009-10. It emphasized that writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked directly under Article 226 unless specific parameters are met. The Court highlighted that the reassessment order is appealable before the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) and the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, and issues of natural justice can be raised before the appellate authority. The Court found no severe breach of natural justice as the petitioner had the opportunity to raise objections. It concluded by stating the petitioner could seek relief through the available appellate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331188