<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 565 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331181</link>
    <description>The court held that the conversion of shares from stock-in-trade to investment did not trigger a taxable event. Therefore, the notice for reopening the assessment beyond the permissible four-year period was unjustified. The court quashed the notice, emphasizing the significance of taxpayers disclosing material facts and restricting tax authorities from reopening assessments without substantial new information within the statutory timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:19:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 565 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331181</link>
      <description>The court held that the conversion of shares from stock-in-trade to investment did not trigger a taxable event. Therefore, the notice for reopening the assessment beyond the permissible four-year period was unjustified. The court quashed the notice, emphasizing the significance of taxpayers disclosing material facts and restricting tax authorities from reopening assessments without substantial new information within the statutory timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>