<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 109 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4493</link>
    <description>Where the Customs Act was extended by notification to designated areas in the continental shelf and exclusive economic zone, those areas were treated as within the customs regime for levy purposes. Oil rigs operating there could not claim the status of foreign-going vessels merely because they were outside territorial waters. Imported stores consumed on such rigs therefore did not qualify for the exemption applicable to consumption on foreign-going vessels, and customs duty was payable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 109 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4493</link>
      <description>Where the Customs Act was extended by notification to designated areas in the continental shelf and exclusive economic zone, those areas were treated as within the customs regime for levy purposes. Oil rigs operating there could not claim the status of foreign-going vessels merely because they were outside territorial waters. Imported stores consumed on such rigs therefore did not qualify for the exemption applicable to consumption on foreign-going vessels, and customs duty was payable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>