<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 560 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331176</link>
    <description>The Madras HC held that co-operative societies carrying on lending and deposit activities within a limited area remained eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i), even though they had associate or class B members who were not voting members and who availed loans for non-agricultural purposes. The Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s attempt to restrict &quot;members&quot; to voting members alone, treating that reading as an impermissible classification within classification. It also held that the existence of associate members did not by itself convert the societies into co-operative banks, and Section 80P(4) did not operate to deny the deduction on the facts presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:18:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 560 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331176</link>
      <description>The Madras HC held that co-operative societies carrying on lending and deposit activities within a limited area remained eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i), even though they had associate or class B members who were not voting members and who availed loans for non-agricultural purposes. The Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s attempt to restrict &quot;members&quot; to voting members alone, treating that reading as an impermissible classification within classification. It also held that the existence of associate members did not by itself convert the societies into co-operative banks, and Section 80P(4) did not operate to deny the deduction on the facts presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>