<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 557 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331173</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the treatment of the cost of production of an abandoned film as revenue expenditure, following relevant judicial decisions and the CBDT Circular. The appeal by the AO challenging the treatment was dismissed, aligning with the established legal position on the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:18:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 557 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331173</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the treatment of the cost of production of an abandoned film as revenue expenditure, following relevant judicial decisions and the CBDT Circular. The appeal by the AO challenging the treatment was dismissed, aligning with the established legal position on the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>