<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 556 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331172</link>
    <description>The appeals were partly allowed, with certain issues being set aside to the AO for fresh determination and others being decided in favor of the assessee based on precedents and judicial pronouncements. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were consistent with earlier rulings in the assessee&#039;s own case and relevant judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:18:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 556 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331172</link>
      <description>The appeals were partly allowed, with certain issues being set aside to the AO for fresh determination and others being decided in favor of the assessee based on precedents and judicial pronouncements. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were consistent with earlier rulings in the assessee&#039;s own case and relevant judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>