<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 548 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331164</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, dismissing the appeal. It emphasized that the penalties were rightly imposed for non-payment and deliberate suppression of service tax, rejecting the appellants&#039; arguments regarding bona fide mistakes and lack of intention to evade tax. The judgment was pronounced in open court, affirming the imposition of penalties under the mentioned sections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2016 13:47:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 548 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331164</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, dismissing the appeal. It emphasized that the penalties were rightly imposed for non-payment and deliberate suppression of service tax, rejecting the appellants&#039; arguments regarding bona fide mistakes and lack of intention to evade tax. The judgment was pronounced in open court, affirming the imposition of penalties under the mentioned sections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>