<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 546 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331162</link>
    <description>A refund notification for export-related services was given a purposive and liberal reading: refund of service tax on terminal handling charges could not be refused merely because formal proof of the service provider&#039;s authorization as a port service provider was absent, where the service was connected with export shipments and tax had been paid. The notification&#039;s expression covering transport of export goods was also held broad enough to include movement of empty containers from the port yard to the factory for stuffing export goods, as that transport was integrally linked to the export process. The refund denial was therefore unsustainable and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2016 13:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 546 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331162</link>
      <description>A refund notification for export-related services was given a purposive and liberal reading: refund of service tax on terminal handling charges could not be refused merely because formal proof of the service provider&#039;s authorization as a port service provider was absent, where the service was connected with export shipments and tax had been paid. The notification&#039;s expression covering transport of export goods was also held broad enough to include movement of empty containers from the port yard to the factory for stuffing export goods, as that transport was integrally linked to the export process. The refund denial was therefore unsustainable and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>