https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331155 The Tribunal set aside the confiscation order and penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules. The weighment of excess stock was deemed unreliable as it was based on estimation rather than actual weighment. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of accurate weighment in such cases to uphold legal validity, ultimately allowing the appeal and providing consequential relief to the appellant. en-us Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331155 The Tribunal set aside the confiscation order and penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules. The weighment of excess stock was deemed unreliable as it was based on estimation rather than actual weighment. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of accurate weighment in such cases to uphold legal validity, ultimately allowing the appeal and providing consequential relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331155