<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 538 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331154</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the demand for recovery of irregularly availed CENVAT credit on steel items and cement was time-barred due to lack of evidence of willful suppression and the department&#039;s awareness of the credit availed. The entire demand of Rs. 7,99,468 was set aside in favor of the appellant based on the limitation issue, with no further analysis on the merits conducted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2016 13:33:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 538 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331154</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the demand for recovery of irregularly availed CENVAT credit on steel items and cement was time-barred due to lack of evidence of willful suppression and the department&#039;s awareness of the credit availed. The entire demand of Rs. 7,99,468 was set aside in favor of the appellant based on the limitation issue, with no further analysis on the merits conducted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>