<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 532 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331148</link>
    <description>The judgment upheld the decision of the Commissioner(Appeals), dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the demand of CENVAT credit wrongly availed on endorsed Bills of Entry by the appellants. The court emphasized that denial of credit based solely on the endorsement of Bills of Entry was unwarranted when supported by proper documentation and evidence of duty payment. Legal precedents and factual evidence confirmed the appellants&#039; eligibility to avail the credit, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2016 13:33:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 532 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331148</link>
      <description>The judgment upheld the decision of the Commissioner(Appeals), dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the demand of CENVAT credit wrongly availed on endorsed Bills of Entry by the appellants. The court emphasized that denial of credit based solely on the endorsement of Bills of Entry was unwarranted when supported by proper documentation and evidence of duty payment. Legal precedents and factual evidence confirmed the appellants&#039; eligibility to avail the credit, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>