<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 251 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4487</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the modification of the order by the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding confiscation and denial of DEPB benefit. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed as the test report on one article did not automatically apply to other articles under the same serial number. The decision was supported by evidence, emphasizing the need for individual testing for each article. The Tribunal found the modification justified and reasonable, given the specific nature of the sample tested and the lack of admission regarding the incorrect description of other items.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 251 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4487</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the modification of the order by the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding confiscation and denial of DEPB benefit. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed as the test report on one article did not automatically apply to other articles under the same serial number. The decision was supported by evidence, emphasizing the need for individual testing for each article. The Tribunal found the modification justified and reasonable, given the specific nature of the sample tested and the lack of admission regarding the incorrect description of other items.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>