<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 529 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331145</link>
    <description>The court stayed the deportation or destruction order of frozen fish lacking a Sanitary Import Permit, allowing release pending lab tests. Upon finding the fish disease-free, the court ordered immediate release to the petitioner, who had to pay testing expenses. The court disposed of the case without awarding litigation costs, leaving the interpretation of the Sanitary Import Permit requirement unresolved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 529 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331145</link>
      <description>The court stayed the deportation or destruction order of frozen fish lacking a Sanitary Import Permit, allowing release pending lab tests. Upon finding the fish disease-free, the court ordered immediate release to the petitioner, who had to pay testing expenses. The court disposed of the case without awarding litigation costs, leaving the interpretation of the Sanitary Import Permit requirement unresolved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>