https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331139 Disputed factual questions in a best judgment tax assessment, including issues on closing stock and alleged sales suppression, were held unsuitable for writ interference under Article 226 when the assessee had received notice and an opportunity to reply. The court found no clear denial of fair hearing or breach of natural justice, so the assessment order was left undisturbed. Liberty was preserved to pursue the statutory appeal, and interim recovery was kept in abeyance for a limited period. en-us Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Aug 2016 13:06:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331139 Disputed factual questions in a best judgment tax assessment, including issues on closing stock and alleged sales suppression, were held unsuitable for writ interference under Article 226 when the assessee had received notice and an opportunity to reply. The court found no clear denial of fair hearing or breach of natural justice, so the assessment order was left undisturbed. Liberty was preserved to pursue the statutory appeal, and interim recovery was kept in abeyance for a limited period. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331139