https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331139 The Court declined to interfere with the tax assessment challenge under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act, 2003 for the year 2009-10, emphasizing the need for factual adjudication by the appellate authority. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to appeal, with recovery steps suspended for four weeks. The Court stressed the importance of a detailed factual examination by the appellate authority to address the petitioner's contentions effectively. en-us Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Aug 2016 13:06:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331139 The Court declined to interfere with the tax assessment challenge under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act, 2003 for the year 2009-10, emphasizing the need for factual adjudication by the appellate authority. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to appeal, with recovery steps suspended for four weeks. The Court stressed the importance of a detailed factual examination by the appellate authority to address the petitioner's contentions effectively. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331139