<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 512 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331128</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues, affirming that deductions under Section 80HHC should be calculated without excluding profits under Section 80IA, excise duty should be excluded from the closing stock valuation, and claims under Section 80IA should be allowed without reducing deductions under Section 80HHC. The judgment aligned with the precedent set by the Supreme Court and the Gujarat High Court, disposing of the appeals in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 512 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331128</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues, affirming that deductions under Section 80HHC should be calculated without excluding profits under Section 80IA, excise duty should be excluded from the closing stock valuation, and claims under Section 80IA should be allowed without reducing deductions under Section 80HHC. The judgment aligned with the precedent set by the Supreme Court and the Gujarat High Court, disposing of the appeals in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>