<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 170 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4483</link>
    <description>Notified packaged biscuits remained liable to valuation under section 4A of the Central Excise Act because the retail sale price declaration framework continued to apply. Rule 5 of the Packaged Commodities Rules, read with its proviso, did not prohibit retail packing in quantities exceeding 1 kg, so oversized packs alone did not exclude the goods from section 4A. No exemption under Rule 34 was established, and valuation therefore had to be made under section 4A rather than section 4.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 170 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4483</link>
      <description>Notified packaged biscuits remained liable to valuation under section 4A of the Central Excise Act because the retail sale price declaration framework continued to apply. Rule 5 of the Packaged Commodities Rules, read with its proviso, did not prohibit retail packing in quantities exceeding 1 kg, so oversized packs alone did not exclude the goods from section 4A. No exemption under Rule 34 was established, and valuation therefore had to be made under section 4A rather than section 4.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>