https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185476 The Supreme Court upheld the Arbitral Tribunal's decision that the breach of contract was by the respondents, dismissing the petitioners' claim for damages and interest. The High Court affirmed the arbitrators' ruling, emphasizing that objections cannot be sustained unless there is an evident error of fact or law in the award. The petitioners' appeal contended misinterpretation of the contract clause, but the Supreme Court held that courts cannot intervene unless a clear legal error is present, ultimately dismissing the petitions and awarding costs to the respondents. en-us Tue, 09 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Aug 2016 12:27:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185476 The Supreme Court upheld the Arbitral Tribunal's decision that the breach of contract was by the respondents, dismissing the petitioners' claim for damages and interest. The High Court affirmed the arbitrators' ruling, emphasizing that objections cannot be sustained unless there is an evident error of fact or law in the award. The petitioners' appeal contended misinterpretation of the contract clause, but the Supreme Court held that courts cannot intervene unless a clear legal error is present, ultimately dismissing the petitions and awarding costs to the respondents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185476