https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185476 An arbitral award will not be disturbed unless a patent error or error of law appears on its face; a court cannot reappreciate contractual construction merely because another view is possible. The damages clause was treated as a special contractual provision limiting recovery to the additional cost of substitute equipment and, where applicable, liquidated damages, so the ordinary measure under the Contract Act did not apply. The claimants also failed to prove substitute purchases linked to the short supply or any actual loss. On that basis, interference was refused and the damages claim was rejected. en-us Tue, 09 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Aug 2016 12:27:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185476 An arbitral award will not be disturbed unless a patent error or error of law appears on its face; a court cannot reappreciate contractual construction merely because another view is possible. The damages clause was treated as a special contractual provision limiting recovery to the additional cost of substitute equipment and, where applicable, liquidated damages, so the ordinary measure under the Contract Act did not apply. The claimants also failed to prove substitute purchases linked to the short supply or any actual loss. On that basis, interference was refused and the damages claim was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185476