<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 49 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4482</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the liability to pay duty on broken kiln tiles classified under Heading 69.01 of the CETA Schedule. The court upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision that since there was no specific entry for waste and scrap of such tiles in Chapter 69 of the Tariff Schedule, the duty payment was not required. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of specific tariff entries for determining excisability, particularly in cases involving the classification of waste and scrap.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 49 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4482</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the liability to pay duty on broken kiln tiles classified under Heading 69.01 of the CETA Schedule. The court upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision that since there was no specific entry for waste and scrap of such tiles in Chapter 69 of the Tariff Schedule, the duty payment was not required. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of specific tariff entries for determining excisability, particularly in cases involving the classification of waste and scrap.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>