<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 623 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185473</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the retention money from the assessment of the year under consideration, as it accrued in the subsequent year. The Tribunal emphasized that income accrual should be based on contractual terms rather than accounting entries, ultimately allowing the appeal against the addition of retention money for the assessment year 1988-89.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2016 11:52:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 623 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185473</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the retention money from the assessment of the year under consideration, as it accrued in the subsequent year. The Tribunal emphasized that income accrual should be based on contractual terms rather than accounting entries, ultimately allowing the appeal against the addition of retention money for the assessment year 1988-89.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>