<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2523 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185468</link>
    <description>Refund of central excise duty on exports to Nepal was held maintainable where duty had already been paid on clearance and export proceeds were received in freely convertible foreign currency. The bond requirement in the export notification was treated as a safeguard for duty-free exports, so its non-execution did not defeat refund once duty had in fact been paid and the payment condition was satisfied. The later reliance on the refund benefit was also accepted, and the notifications for the relevant period were treated as pari materia. The rejection of the refund claim was therefore unsustainable, and refund relief was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2016 11:45:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2523 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185468</link>
      <description>Refund of central excise duty on exports to Nepal was held maintainable where duty had already been paid on clearance and export proceeds were received in freely convertible foreign currency. The bond requirement in the export notification was treated as a safeguard for duty-free exports, so its non-execution did not defeat refund once duty had in fact been paid and the payment condition was satisfied. The later reliance on the refund benefit was also accepted, and the notifications for the relevant period were treated as pari materia. The rejection of the refund claim was therefore unsustainable, and refund relief was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>