<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 501 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331117</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court quashed the proceedings against the appellants due to the absence of prior sanction from the Central Government as required under Section 197 CrPC. The court held that the acts alleged were connected to the appellants&#039; official duties, necessitating prior sanction for prosecution. The orders of the High Court and the Special Judge were set aside, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 18:45:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 501 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331117</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court quashed the proceedings against the appellants due to the absence of prior sanction from the Central Government as required under Section 197 CrPC. The court held that the acts alleged were connected to the appellants&#039; official duties, necessitating prior sanction for prosecution. The orders of the High Court and the Special Judge were set aside, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>