https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185444 Lawyers have no right to strike or boycott court work, and an advocate who has accepted a brief is expected to attend court despite any strike call. Such abstention is treated as unprofessional and disruptive of the administration of justice; courts are not required to adjourn matters because lawyers are absent and retain supervisory control over proceedings. Bar Councils and Bar Associations must not support strike or boycott calls, and where contumacious or unbecoming conduct is brought to notice, they are expected to act in accordance with law. Courts may proceed with work and, in appropriate cases, impose costs on advocates who stay away pursuant to strike calls. en-us Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Aug 2016 17:28:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185444 Lawyers have no right to strike or boycott court work, and an advocate who has accepted a brief is expected to attend court despite any strike call. Such abstention is treated as unprofessional and disruptive of the administration of justice; courts are not required to adjourn matters because lawyers are absent and retain supervisory control over proceedings. Bar Councils and Bar Associations must not support strike or boycott calls, and where contumacious or unbecoming conduct is brought to notice, they are expected to act in accordance with law. Courts may proceed with work and, in appropriate cases, impose costs on advocates who stay away pursuant to strike calls. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185444