<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 500 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331116</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the service tax demand against the appellant for deputing employees to serve under the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons. The Tribunal relied on precedents from High Courts and previous decisions to determine that deputing employees for specific work does not constitute providing manpower recruitment service. The Revenue Department representative acknowledged the issue was covered by existing decisions, leading to the appeal being granted in favor of the appellant, with consequential relief provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 500 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331116</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the service tax demand against the appellant for deputing employees to serve under the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons. The Tribunal relied on precedents from High Courts and previous decisions to determine that deputing employees for specific work does not constitute providing manpower recruitment service. The Revenue Department representative acknowledged the issue was covered by existing decisions, leading to the appeal being granted in favor of the appellant, with consequential relief provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>