https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331112 The Tribunal dismissed both the appellant's and Revenue's appeals, ruling that the appellant had no merit in the determination of assessable value for excise duty and that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked due to the absence of facts suppression. The appeals were rejected, and cross objections were disposed of accordingly. en-us Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:54:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331112 The Tribunal dismissed both the appellant's and Revenue's appeals, ruling that the appellant had no merit in the determination of assessable value for excise duty and that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked due to the absence of facts suppression. The appeals were rejected, and cross objections were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331112