<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 494 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331110</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s entitlement to cenvat credit on goods consigned for manufacturing capital goods, emphasizing the importance of duty paid documents and actual utilization in the manufacturing process. It clarified that ownership of goods is not a prerequisite for availing credit as long as they are intended for manufacturing finished excisable goods. The decision affirmed eligibility for cenvat credit on goods used in manufacturing, even if classified as immovable property, as long as they are utilized in the production process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 10:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 494 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331110</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s entitlement to cenvat credit on goods consigned for manufacturing capital goods, emphasizing the importance of duty paid documents and actual utilization in the manufacturing process. It clarified that ownership of goods is not a prerequisite for availing credit as long as they are intended for manufacturing finished excisable goods. The decision affirmed eligibility for cenvat credit on goods used in manufacturing, even if classified as immovable property, as long as they are utilized in the production process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>