<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 827 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185442</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the deletion of the addition of undisclosed income related to the Taleigao property for the assessment year 2007-08. The Assessing Officer&#039;s lack of independent inquiries and failure to establish the genuineness of the transaction led to the decision. The Tribunal concurred with the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling that insufficient evidence and inconclusive facts warranted the removal of the addition, ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:10:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 827 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185442</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the deletion of the addition of undisclosed income related to the Taleigao property for the assessment year 2007-08. The Assessing Officer&#039;s lack of independent inquiries and failure to establish the genuineness of the transaction led to the decision. The Tribunal concurred with the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling that insufficient evidence and inconclusive facts warranted the removal of the addition, ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>