<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 475 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331091</link>
    <description>A works contract executed in a Special Economic Zone may not be denied tax exemption merely because customs or SEZ endorsement on running invoices was impracticable where purchase-bill endorsement had already been obtained and the applicable procedural rule was substantially complied with. The text states that sections 21 and 22 of the Gujarat Special Economic Zone Act, 2004 prevent State tax on sale or purchase of goods within the SEZ area, so a contrary assessment based on rigid insistence on invoice endorsement cannot stand. The assessment is therefore to be modified and tax liability, with consequential interest and penalty, recomputed in line with the earlier binding ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 475 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331091</link>
      <description>A works contract executed in a Special Economic Zone may not be denied tax exemption merely because customs or SEZ endorsement on running invoices was impracticable where purchase-bill endorsement had already been obtained and the applicable procedural rule was substantially complied with. The text states that sections 21 and 22 of the Gujarat Special Economic Zone Act, 2004 prevent State tax on sale or purchase of goods within the SEZ area, so a contrary assessment based on rigid insistence on invoice endorsement cannot stand. The assessment is therefore to be modified and tax liability, with consequential interest and penalty, recomputed in line with the earlier binding ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>