https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331090 Draft fiscal notifications reducing VAT and entry tax were first vetted by the Government Advocate and the Advocate General, then placed before the Cabinet, which approved them before issuance. On that factual basis, the challenge alleging absence of Cabinet approval and resulting illegality failed because the record did not support the asserted defect in the notification process. The writ petition was dismissed, and no direction for CBI investigation, recovery proceedings, or rectification was granted. en-us Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331090 Draft fiscal notifications reducing VAT and entry tax were first vetted by the Government Advocate and the Advocate General, then placed before the Cabinet, which approved them before issuance. On that factual basis, the challenge alleging absence of Cabinet approval and resulting illegality failed because the record did not support the asserted defect in the notification process. The writ petition was dismissed, and no direction for CBI investigation, recovery proceedings, or rectification was granted. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331090