<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Case: Sections 271D &amp; 271E - Assessee&#039;s Amounts Seen as Advances, Not Loans; Revenue&#039;s Claims Lack Evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30755</link>
    <description>Penalty levied u/s 271D and 271E - whether the amount received by the assessee were advances and not loan or deposits? - allegation of the Revenue of manipulation are baseless and without any supporting evidence - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:21:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:21:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Case: Sections 271D &amp; 271E - Assessee&#039;s Amounts Seen as Advances, Not Loans; Revenue&#039;s Claims Lack Evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30755</link>
      <description>Penalty levied u/s 271D and 271E - whether the amount received by the assessee were advances and not loan or deposits? - allegation of the Revenue of manipulation are baseless and without any supporting evidence - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:21:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>