<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 469 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331085</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the assessing officer under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding unsecured loans for the assessment year 2010-11. The Tribunal found that the loans were genuine, re-grouped for administrative convenience without fresh borrowings, and confirmed by creditors in their tax returns. The revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the assessment of unsecured loans.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:21:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 469 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331085</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the assessing officer under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding unsecured loans for the assessment year 2010-11. The Tribunal found that the loans were genuine, re-grouped for administrative convenience without fresh borrowings, and confirmed by creditors in their tax returns. The revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the assessment of unsecured loans.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>