<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 458 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331074</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition related to unexplained investments in land, emphasizing the lack of evidence provided by the assessee to justify the source of funds. The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, affirming certain additions while modifying others based on the evidence and explanations presented, balancing the need for verification with the requirement for clear evidence to support financial transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:20:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 458 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331074</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition related to unexplained investments in land, emphasizing the lack of evidence provided by the assessee to justify the source of funds. The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, affirming certain additions while modifying others based on the evidence and explanations presented, balancing the need for verification with the requirement for clear evidence to support financial transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>