<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1496 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185422</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting the appellant entitlement to the Cenvat credit but confirming the penalty imposed under Rule 27 for breaching Cenvat credit rules and using two sets of invoice books simultaneously.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1496 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185422</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting the appellant entitlement to the Cenvat credit but confirming the penalty imposed under Rule 27 for breaching Cenvat credit rules and using two sets of invoice books simultaneously.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>