<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1553 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185431</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) and payment towards Employees Group Gratuity Fund. However, the disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) for not capitalizing interest on borrowed funds was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:29:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1553 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185431</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) and payment towards Employees Group Gratuity Fund. However, the disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) for not capitalizing interest on borrowed funds was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>