<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2519 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185421</link>
    <description>An appeal dismissed for non-compliance with a stay order was restored after the balance pre-deposit was made within the time directed by the High Court. The restoration was considered against the earlier stay condition and the High Court&#039;s direction that the appeal would revive on timely deposit of the remaining amount. As the record showed compliance within the stipulated period, the appeal was restored to its original number and the restoration application was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:27:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2519 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185421</link>
      <description>An appeal dismissed for non-compliance with a stay order was restored after the balance pre-deposit was made within the time directed by the High Court. The restoration was considered against the earlier stay condition and the High Court&#039;s direction that the appeal would revive on timely deposit of the remaining amount. As the record showed compliance within the stipulated period, the appeal was restored to its original number and the restoration application was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>