<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 99 - HIGH COURT RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4464</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied where the assessee bought inputs on endorsed gate passes showing an approved classification, the suppliers had been exonerated, and there was no collusion. The Court treated the assessee as having taken reasonable steps under the fourth proviso to Rule 57G(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and held that later chemical analysis could not override the regular documents once the suppliers were not found to have wilfully misstated the goods. It further noted that allowing the Department&#039;s case would indirectly reopen the suppliers&#039; classification, already certified by the jurisdictional authorities, in the same proceeding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 99 - HIGH COURT RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4464</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied where the assessee bought inputs on endorsed gate passes showing an approved classification, the suppliers had been exonerated, and there was no collusion. The Court treated the assessee as having taken reasonable steps under the fourth proviso to Rule 57G(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and held that later chemical analysis could not override the regular documents once the suppliers were not found to have wilfully misstated the goods. It further noted that allowing the Department&#039;s case would indirectly reopen the suppliers&#039; classification, already certified by the jurisdictional authorities, in the same proceeding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>